Hanneke Weitering is a writer and editor with AIN covering advanced air mobility and new flight technologies. She became an aviation journalist and joined the AIN team in the summer of 2022 after reporting on spaceflight and astronomy for six years at Space.com. After earning a bachelor’s degree in physics from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, she moved to New York City to pursue a master’s degree in science, health, and environmental reporting at New York University&#039;s Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute. She is now based in Seattle near Boeing Field and spends her free time exploring nature in the Pacific Northwest.

Science & Technology Editor

Hanneke Weitering

Boeing has once again found itself in the doghouse.
Last week, Boeing invited dozens of reporters from around the world—including me, a local Seattleite—to its 737 production facility in Renton, Washington, to highlight improvements to its safety and quality culture.
Ironically, comments made during a briefing on its new safety and quality improvement plan landed Boeing in hot water with the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which slapped the company with sanctions the next day.
Before laying out the details of its FAA-ordered safety and quality overhaul, Elizabeth Lund—senior v-p of quality at Boeing’s commercial airplanes division—made brief remarks about the January 5 incident in which a mid-exit door plug blew out of an Alaska Airlines 737 Max 9 departing from Portland, Oregon.
According to the NTSB, Lund’s comments contained unreleased and unverified details about its ongoing investigation and amounted to “blatant violations” of federal regulations and the terms of Boeing’s party agreement to the investigation.&nbsp;In response, the NTSB rescinded Boeing’s access to investigative materials and filed a complaint with the Department of Justice, which is also separately charging Boeing for crimes pertaining to the fatal Max crashes in 2018 and 2019.
In case you need a refresher, here’s what the NTSB has publicly said about the door plug fiasco so far: Four retaining bolts intended to hold the plug in place were missing when the airplane left the Renton factory last year. Records showed that the door plug had been removed so that technicians at Spirit AeroSystems, Boeing’s fuselage supplier, could access nearby rivets for repairs. Whoever subsequently closed the door plug did not reinstall the bolts.
In a perplexing plot twist, Lund revealed during the June 25 briefing that Boeing does not believe the mechanics who reinstalled the door plug are to blame for the missing bolts. Rather, Boeing believes that a missing piece of paperwork caused a breakdown in its processes that led an aircraft to roll off the production line without those bolts in place.
Lund explained that a so-called “move crew” at the Renton factory closed the door plug before moving the airplane outside the factory. “We know the move crew closed the plug. They did not reinstall the retaining pins. That is not their job. Their job is to just close it and they count on existing paperwork.”
Exactly whose job it was to file that crucial piece of paperwork remains a mystery that Lund said is up to the NTSB to solve—although the NTSB disputed the notion that its mission is to name names or point fingers.
Perhaps an even bigger mystery, though, is how one simple piece of paperwork became a single point of failure. “The fact that one employee could not fill out one piece of paperwork in this condition and could result in an accident was shocking to all of us,” Lund said.
The NTSB’s rebuke calls into question Lund’s account of the events that led up to the door plug debacle. But one thing is for certain: Boeing screwed up—again.
Boeing billed the two-day-long media gathering in Washington as a preview for the Farnborough International Airshow, where the plane-maker typically announces new orders or products. But this year, it dedicated the event to convincing the media that its airplanes are safe at a time when public trust in the company is at an all-time low.
In describing the actions it has taken to fix its quality control problems, Boeing painted a convincing picture of a system that appears to be fail-safe. But we’ve heard Boeing say similar things before, and the company’s deficient safety culture has nevertheless persisted.
Lund said that this time with the door plug is different from the situation that caused the 737 Max crashes because it was a manufacturing issue rather than an engineering issue. But this comparison between the causes of the accidents doesn’t really help Boeing’s case, because it indicates an even deeper problem.
Deficiencies in Boeing’s safety culture extend beyond any particular program or process. It’s a systemic issue that reaches up the company’s corporate ladder all the way to its chief executives. Only a change in leadership can bring about effective changes to the company’s culture.
We saw Boeing oust its previous CEO in the aftermath of the Max crashes, and its new CEO is now planning to step down by year-end. We can only hope that whoever Boeing selects as its next CEO will be able to bring meaningful change.

News and information on safety procedures and concerns.

Opinion: Boeing Safety Charade Prompts NTSB Rebuke

Safety and quality assurance briefing leads to NTSB sanctions

Boeing has once again found itself in the doghouse, this time for the unauthorized release of information pertaining to the NTSB's door plug investigation. 

2024 Corporate Aviation Leadership Summit

Kerry Lynch

News and issues relating to business, corporate and private aviation, primarily regarding turbine-engine-powered airplanes and helicopters. Subjects include aircraft, engines, maintenance, operations, personnel, acquisitions, accidents, safety, security, and training.

Wet/contaminated runways are the most common factor in runway excursions

Standards, Training Key To Avoiding Runway Excursions

Panelists at the Bombardier Safety Standdown agreed that communication is essential to safety

In Multi-generational Workplace, Communication Is Key

Chad Trautvetter

Experts to review and discuss current and emerging safety challenges

Next ACSF Aviation Safety Symposium Set for April 2025

AmyWilder

News about bills, laws, regulations and other governmental decisions affecting aviation and aerospace. Topics include FAA re-authorizations, taxes on fuel and aviation activities, environmental legislation, ICAO decisions, governmental mediation of labor conflicts and World Trade Organization disputes and decisions.

Systems, culture, and training key to preventing aviation mishaps

Ferraro's Safety Case Study: Lessons from a Not-quite Incident

News and issues concerning general aviation, specifically airplanes and helicopters powered by piston and alternative engines (i.e., non-turbine powered aircraft). Subjects include aircraft, engines, personnel, acquisitions, accidents, safety, security and training.

Influence shapes safety culture in aviation

Michael Graham Talks Safety Culture at Standdown

Matt Thurber

Tony Kern brings his A game to the annual safety event

Hypervigilance and the Right Influence

Wichita welcomed attendees to the 28th edition of the Safety Standdown

Bombardier Safety Standdown Promotes Safety Influencers

New developments and products in avionics, specifically about aircraft electronics in the cockpit.

News and issues relating to international air transport and cargo carriers, national airlines and regional airlines, including aircraft, engines, personnel, acquisitions, accidents, safety, security and training.

In this article

Boeing

More In Safety